# How are top-grossing apps testing price increases?

Author: Ali Abouelatta
Source date: 2024-03-01
Tags: monetization, pricing, subscription, experimentation
HTML: https://lazyweb.com/research/pricing-experiments
Markdown: https://lazyweb.com/research/pricing-experiments.md

## Primary visual

Local image URL: https://lazyweb.com/research-assets/pricing-experiments/01-pricing-summary.webp
Original image URL: https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/9ee20946-d5e8-49cf-bb4a-9d2565369700_1200x628.png
Alt text: Pricing experiments summary graphic from First 1000.
Image description: A summary graphic introduces the pricing experiment review across top-grossing subscription apps.

Short answer: Ali's top-100 grossing app review found that about 20% tested a price increase over six months, with an average increase of about 27%. Around a third of those tests pushed harder toward annual plans, while about 10% of observed pricing experiments were not successful.

## Evidence

The issue is data-report oriented: price increases are common, but the shape of the increase matters as much as the absolute price.

## What changed

- Some apps raised monthly and annual prices together.
- Some apps raised monthly pricing more aggressively to make annual plans more attractive.
- Lifetime and weekly plans appeared more robust to price increases in the reviewed set.

## Why it matters

- A price increase is also a packaging experiment.
- The annual-plan nudge can be built through relative pricing, not only discount copy.

## Sources

- [1] Lazyweb Research: top-100 app pricing experiments. Reports about 20% of top-100 grossing apps tested price increases, the average increase was about 27%, about a third pushed annual plans, and about 10% were unsuccessful. [Source](https://read.first1000.co/p/pricing-experiments)